Explore SFFMedia

You may know it as SF, Sci-fi, speculative fiction, magical realism, fantasy, phantasy, or just plain science fiction and fantasy. Whatever your label, SFFMedia provides unique perspectives on these genres' movies, novels and television shows. Read the latest news and independent reviews online 24/7.
More about SFFMedia
Home arrow Films arrow Science fiction films arrow Why we need Paramount's new Dune movie
Why we need Paramount's new Dune movie PDF Print E-mail
Written by John Howell   
Friday, 18 January 2008

David Lynch's 1984 version of Dune After two flawed versions, the first by David Lynch in 1984, and the second by the Sci-Fi Channel in 2000, the possibility of an entirely new, big budget production of Frank Herbert's Dune novels is welcome news.

In October, Byran Merritt, grandson of the late Frank Herbert, commented in a Dune forum that "Although only a rumour, I've heard that 'someone' at the studio wants Dune really badly and has been a fan of the novel for 'years'. They're not saying who this is (and it might just be hype) but I'm holding out hope that whoever this might be is a big enough fan that he/she will do the book justice. Supposedly it's some director."

Later MTV Movies followed up with the news that the Director in question is Peter Berg (Director of The Kingdom) and the studio is Paramount.

Peter Berg has been quoted as saying that his involvement was a "done deal" and that if not for the Hollywood writer's strike "we'd be in it right now". He called himself a massive fan of the books and called the plans for his version of Dune "big, big, big".

However, responding to a post on 27 December asking whether a release date of 2009 on Peter Berg's Wikipedia page was in any way accurate, Byran Merritt wrote: "None whatsoever. The attorneys are still in negotiations..."

Still, it's clear that discussions are happening. If not Peter Berg, let's hope someone else begins a new Dune movie in the near future.

While David Lynch's 1984 movie version had great production values, a rousing soundtrack by Toto, and excellent performances, notably from Patrick Stewart, Kyle MacLachlan and Max Von Sydow, it was killed by a messy screenplay with a stupid ending (which had nothing to do with the book) along with pointlessly gory scenes of the Baron Harkonen. His boils and sores, for example, although mentioned in the book, were way over the top. And what was Sting doing dancing around in his underpants?

In particular, who can forget the cat milking scene? I certainly can't. This was easily one of the silliest scenes in science fiction movie history. If you still have fond memories of the movie, watch the cat milking scene on YouTube here and you may feel differently. What was David Lynch thinking? Could someone also explain to me what the mouse was doing there?

In contrast to David Lynch's big budget version, the Sci-Fi Channel's miniseries which began in 2000 with Dune and continued with Children of Dune, had low production values and some average acting (especially the supporting cast in Dune), but at least made an attempt to follow the books.

A publicity shot for Paramount's new Dune movie? We need someone to make up for the first two attempts. At least give Dune the big screen treatment while attempting to capture the spirit of the books. While complex, the source material is rich, and like the Lord of the Ring's movies, there's a massive fan base ready and waiting to queue up for tickets if someone can get it right.

Hopefully the next Dune article you read on this site will be confirmation that a new Dune movie has been greenlit and production is in full swing.

Before we leave the subject of the Dune series and cats (hopefully forever), take a look at this picture I stumbled upon recently. Could this be the first publicity shot from Paramount's new Dune?

Trackback(0)
Comments (8)Add Comment
...
written by Martin, January 18, 2008
To make Dune a success the Director has to do what Peter Jackson did for Lord of the Rings.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +7
and don't forget...
written by Roger Dupuy, January 18, 2008
...the stupid wristband wielding Fedaykin.

ZOOOOOOOMMM!

Although the Bene Gesserit Reverend Mother was spot on!

...and the cute fishy fishy Guild Navigators!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
I agree
written by Revital Salomon, January 27, 2008
We need a new Dune, but it really has to be grand - like Jackson's LOTR.

The thing that scares me most is the casting - which Lynch actually did very well. Who would you cast as Paul, for example? Or Jessica? It will be so easy to fall to clichs and hunt for stars, instead of choosing the right actors.

Still, I hope we will see a grand production of Dune soon.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
How about some of the prequel stuff first???
written by Jeff C, February 13, 2008
I think I would much rather see a treatment of Brian Herbert's prequel books first, someone could keep themselves busy for 2 decades doing the entire series from Brian's stuff through his fathers 6 originals. He also has the 2 books he finished based on his fathers notes for "Dune 7". The Herbert's have created an immense imaginary world that would look tremendous on the big screen.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
...
written by malex, February 23, 2008
it would be nice if toto s soundtrack used again in the new movie.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
The Prequels are Pulp Crap
written by Freakzilla, March 22, 2008
So are his sequels. But to call them Brian Herbert's books doesn't give credit to the destroyer of Sci-Fi universes, Kevin Anderson.

Both of whom are now being called "co-producers" of the new movie. Now they can destroy FH's legacy on film just like they did in print!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
well...
written by next gen director, April 12, 2008
if you give me 100m$ i will do it!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Tony S
written by Tony Seymour, June 01, 2008
It is my fervent wish that Lynch's hopeless mess of Frank Herbert's brilliant story is eventually forgotten about and ends up on the scrapheap of movie history. Surely one of the worst movies ever made. The Scifi Channel's efforts, whilst not without their flaws, were vastly more faithful to both the story and the overall feel of the books. As for the prequels? Forget them! We can only keep our fingers crossed that any new movie keeps faith with Frank's original vision.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy



Submit article to a news site
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Spurl!Wists!Newsvine!Blinklist!Furl!Fark!Blogmarks!Yahoo!Smarking!Netvouz!Shadows!RawSugar!Ma.gnolia!PlugIM!Squidoo!BlogMemes!BlinkBits!Tailrank!linkaGoGo!
 

Buy from Amazon and support SFFMedia!


Log in

Log in or register to leave comments, subscribe to notification of new comments, etc.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register